B.A.M. Development, LLC v. Salt Lake County (“BAM I”)–Applying the rough proportionality test to exactions.
B.A.M. Development LLC v. Salt Lake County (“BAM II”)–Rough proportionality analysis compares the expense to the property owner with the cost to address the development’s impact.
B.A.M. Development LLC v. Salt Lake County (“BAM III”)–Discussion of how governmental expenses factor into rough proportionality analysis.
Banberry Development Corporation v. South Jordan–Reasonableness of Impact Fees.
Call v. West Jordan–Exactions must be reasonably attributable to development activity.
Dolan v. City of Tigard–Establishes “rough proportionality” test for exactions.
Home Builders Association v. American Fork–Validity of impact fees.
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.–Exaction analysis applies whenever government imposes conditions on approval of a land use application.
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission–There must be an essential link between an exaction and a legitimate government interest.