Property Rights Ombudsman

Utah Department of Commerce

Menu

Skip to content
  • Request Mediation or Arbitration
  • Request an Advisory Opinion
  • Request Training
  • Find the Law

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • #3836 (no title)
  • #4309 (no title)
  • #5035 (no title)
  • About Mediation and Arbitration
  • About the Ombudsman
  • Access Rights
  • Adverse Possession
  • Advisory Opinions
    • A: Impact Fees Act
    • Appealing Land Use Decisions
    • E: Entitlement to Application Approval (Vesting)
    • P: Application Review Fees
    • View All Advisory Opinions
      • #3085 (no title)
      • Advisory Opinion #20
      • Advisory Opinion # 126
      • Advisory Opinion # 127
      • Advisory Opinion # 133
      • Advisory Opinion #1
      • Advisory Opinion #10
      • Advisory Opinion #100
      • Advisory Opinion #101
      • Advisory Opinion #102
      • Advisory Opinion #103
      • Advisory Opinion #104
      • Advisory Opinion #105
      • Advisory Opinion #106
      • Advisory Opinion #107
      • Advisory Opinion #108
      • Advisory Opinion #109
      • Advisory Opinion #11
      • Advisory Opinion #110
      • Advisory Opinion #111
      • Advisory Opinion #112
      • Advisory Opinion #113
      • Advisory Opinion #114
      • Advisory Opinion #115
      • Advisory Opinion #116
      • Advisory Opinion #117
      • Advisory Opinion #118
      • Advisory Opinion #119
      • Advisory Opinion #12
      • Advisory Opinion #120
      • Advisory Opinion #121
      • Advisory Opinion #122
      • Advisory Opinion #123
      • Advisory Opinion #125
      • Advisory Opinion #128
      • Advisory Opinion #129
      • Advisory Opinion #13
      • Advisory Opinion #130
      • Advisory Opinion #131
      • Advisory Opinion #134
      • Advisory Opinion #135
      • Advisory Opinion #136
      • Advisory Opinion #137
      • Advisory Opinion #14
      • Advisory Opinion #15
      • Advisory Opinion #16
      • Advisory Opinion #17
      • Advisory Opinion #18
      • Advisory Opinion #19
      • Advisory Opinion #2
      • Advisory Opinion #21
      • Advisory Opinion #22
      • Advisory Opinion #23
      • Advisory Opinion #24
      • Advisory Opinion #25
      • Advisory Opinion #26
      • Advisory Opinion #27
      • Advisory Opinion #28
      • Advisory Opinion #29
      • Advisory Opinion #3
      • Advisory Opinion #30
      • Advisory Opinion #31
      • Advisory Opinion #32
      • Advisory Opinion #33
      • Advisory Opinion #34
      • Advisory Opinion #35
      • Advisory Opinion #36
      • Advisory Opinion #37
      • Advisory Opinion #38
      • Advisory Opinion #39
      • Advisory Opinion #4
      • Advisory Opinion #40
      • Advisory Opinion #41
      • Advisory Opinion #42
      • Advisory Opinion #43
      • Advisory Opinion #44
      • Advisory Opinion #45
      • Advisory Opinion #46
      • Advisory Opinion #47
      • Advisory Opinion #48
      • Advisory Opinion #49
      • Advisory Opinion #5
      • Advisory Opinion #50
      • Advisory Opinion #51
      • Advisory Opinion #52
      • Advisory Opinion #53
      • Advisory Opinion #54
      • Advisory Opinion #55
      • Advisory Opinion #56
      • Advisory Opinion #57
      • Advisory Opinion #58
      • Advisory Opinion #59
      • Advisory Opinion #6
      • Advisory Opinion #60
      • Advisory Opinion #61
      • Advisory Opinion #62
      • Advisory Opinion #63
      • Advisory Opinion #64
      • Advisory Opinion #65
      • Advisory Opinion #66
      • Advisory Opinion #67
      • Advisory Opinion #68
      • Advisory Opinion #69
      • Advisory Opinion #7
      • Advisory Opinion #70
      • Advisory Opinion #71
      • Advisory Opinion #72
      • Advisory Opinion #73
      • Advisory Opinion #74
      • Advisory Opinion #75
      • Advisory Opinion #76
      • Advisory Opinion #77
      • Advisory Opinion #78
      • Advisory Opinion #79
      • Advisory Opinion #8
      • Advisory Opinion #80
      • Advisory Opinion #81
      • Advisory Opinion #82
      • Advisory Opinion #83
      • Advisory Opinion #84
      • Advisory Opinion #85
      • Advisory Opinion #86
      • Advisory Opinion #87
      • Advisory Opinion #88
      • Advisory Opinion #89
      • Advisory Opinion #9
      • Advisory Opinion #90
      • Advisory Opinion #91
      • Advisory Opinion #92
      • Advisory Opinion #93
      • Advisory Opinion #94
      • Advisory Opinion #95
      • Advisory Opinion #96
      • Advisory Opinion #97
      • Advisory Opinion #98
      • Advisory Opinion #99
      • Advisory Opinion 124
      • Advisory Opinion 43
    • vii. Development Bonds
    • Appealing Review Fees
    • B. Conditional Use Applications
    • C: Limit on Single Family Designation
    • H: Compelling, Countervailing Interests
    • D: Exactions on Development
    • F. Complete Land Use Application
    • G: Proceeding with Reasonable Diligence
    • I: Pending Ordinances
    • J: Requirements Imposed Upon Development
    • K: Compliance with Mandatory Land Use Ordinances
    • L: Review for Application Completeness
    • M: Substantive Review of Application
    • N: Review of Warranty Work for Completion
    • O: Transferable Development Rights
    • Q: Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures
    • Other Topics (i): Temporary Land Use Ordinances
    • Other Topics (ii): Subdivision Plat Approval
    • Other Topics (iii): Waiver of Conditions
    • Other Topics (iv): Lot Line Adjustment within a Subdivision
    • Other Topics (v): Interpretation of Ordinances
    • Other Topics (vi): Easements
    • Other Topics (vii): Development Bonds
    • Other Topics (viii): Appealing Land Use Decisions
  • All Cases Listed Alphabetically
  • Alta v. Ben Hame Corp.
  • Appeals and Appeal Authorities
  • Appeals from Land Use Decisions
  • B.A.M. Development, LLC v. Salt Lake County (“BAM I”)
  • B.A.M. Development, LLC v. Salt Lake County (“BAM II”)
  • B.A.M. Development, LLC v. Salt Lake County (“BAM III”)
  • Bagford v. Ephraim City
  • Banberry Development Corp. v. South Jordan
  • Berman v. Parker
  • Bills With Low or Coincidental Impact
  • Bills With Moderate or Indirect Impact
  • Bills With Significant or Direct Impact
  • Bingham v. Roosevelt City
  • Boundary Disputes
  • Bountiful City v. DeLuca
  • Bradley v. Payson City
  • Call v. West Jordan
  • Carrier v. Lindquist
  • Cedar Mountain Environmental, Inc. v. Tooele County
  • City of Grantsville v. Tooele City
  • City of Hildale v. Cooke
  • City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey
  • Colman v. Utah State Land Board
  • Conatser v. Johnson
  • Conditional Uses
  • Constitution
  • Contact Us
  • Cornish Town v. Koller
  • Dairy Product Services, Inc. v. Wellsville
  • Davis County v. Clearfield City
  • Davis County v. Zions First National Bank
  • Dolan v. City of Tigard
  • Easements
  • Eminent Domain Cases
  • Exactions
  • Exactions and Impact Fees Cases
  • Farmer’s New World Life Insurance Co. v. Bountiful City
  • Find The Law
    • Diamond B-Y Ranches v. Tooele County
    • Lingle v. Chevron USA, Inc.
    • UDOT v. Admiral Beverage Corp.
    • Useful Links to Titles of the Utah Code
    • Variances
    • Appellate Decisions
    • Legal Topics
  • Find The Law Redux
  • First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. County of Los Angeles
  • Fox v. Park City
  • Gillmor v. Summit County
  • Glossary
  • Group Home Presentation
  • H.B. 101-S: Homeowners Association Amendments
  • H.B. 11-S: Local Transportation Corridor Preservation Fund Amendments
  • H.B. 111-S2: Eminent Domain Amendments
  • H.B. 113: County Governing Body Amendments
  • H.B. 130-S: Boundary Adjustment Amendments (Amends LUDMA)
  • H.B. 166: Water Rights Amendments
  • H.B. 217-S2: State Fire Code Act Amendments
  • H.B. 224 Impact Fees Amendments (Amends LUDMA)
  • H.B. 236-S: Land Development Revisions (Amends CLUDMA)
  • H.B. 279: Administrative Hearings By Counties
  • H.B. 29: Adjudication of Water Rights
  • H.B. 310: Construction Code Amendments
  • H.B. 326: Division of Water Rights Amendments
  • H.B. 347: Landowner Liability Amendments
  • H.B. 348: Local District Amendments
  • H.B. 358: Instream Flow Amendments
  • H.B. 360: Water and Irrigation Revisions
  • H.B. 36: Storm Water Capture Amendments
  • H.B. 401-S2: Statute of Limitations on Trespass
  • H.B. 54-S2: Property Tax and Appraiser Amendments
  • H.B. 71: Mobile and Manufactured Home Amendments
  • H.B. 73: Water Easement Amendments
  • H.B. 74-S: Property Tax Modifications
  • H.B. 86: Property Tax Certification Date
  • H.B. 88-S2: Land Use Amendments (Amends LUDMA)
  • Hamblin v. Clearfield
  • Harmon City, Inc. v. Draper City
  • Hatch v. Boulder Town
  • Hawai’i Housing Authority v. Midkiff
  • Home Builders Association v. American Fork
  • Impact Fees
  • Just Compensation
  • Just Compensation Cases
  • Kelo v. City of New London
  • Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass’n v. DeBenedictis
  • Koontz v. St Johns River Water Management District
  • Land Use and Development
  • Land Use Regulation Cases
  • LC Canyon Partners, LLC v. Salt Lake County
  • Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.
  • Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
  • Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch Partnership
  • Morrison v. Horne
  • Nollan v. California Coastal Commission
  • Nonconforming Uses and Noncomplying Structures
  • Olsen v. Park City
  • Pacific West Communities, Inc. v. Grantsville City
  • Palazzolo v. Rhode Island
  • Patterson v. American Fork
  • Pen & Ink, LLC v. Alpine City
  • Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City
  • Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon
  • Petersen v. Riverton City
  • Price Development Co. v. Orem City
  • Provo City v. Ivie
  • Q-2, LLC v. Hughes
  • Recent Presentations
  • Rocky Mountain Thrift Stores, Inc. v. Salt Lake City
  • S.B. 101: Division of Water Rights Revisions
  • S.B. 153: Local Government Development Amendments (Amends LUDMA)
  • S.B. 269-S: Property Tax Revisions
  • S.B. 30: Water and Irrigation Amendments
  • S.B. 64-S: Homeowner Reserve Account Amendments
  • S.B. 90-S2: Condominium and Community Association Amendments
  • Salt Lake City Mission v. Salt Lake City
  • Salt Lake County v. Kartchner
  • Sanguinetti v. United States
  • Save Our Canyons v. Board of Adjustment of Salt Lake County
  • Scherbel v. Salt Lake City
  • Sections of the Utah Code
  • Selman v. Box Elder County
  • Smith Investment Company v. Sandy City
  • Stucker v. Summit County
  • Takings
  • Takings and Eminent Domain
  • Takings Cases
  • Temporary Land Use Regulation (i.e., Moratorium)
  • The Carpet Barn v. UDOT
  • The Land Use, Development, and Management Act (LUDMA)
  • Three D Corp. v. Salt Lake City
  • Tooele Associates, LP v. Tooele City (2011)
  • Tooele County v. Ferrebee
  • Training Request Form
  • Transferable Development Rights
  • UDOT v. Harvey Real Estate
  • Uintah Mountain RTC, LLC v. Duchesne County
  • Utah County v. Baxter
  • Utah County v. Ivie
  • Utah County v. Young
  • Vested Rights
  • Vested Rights Cases
  • Vial v. Provo City
  • Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty
  • Wadsworth v. West Jordan City
  • Wasatch County v. Okelberry
  • Wells v. Salt Lake City
  • Western Land Equities v. City of Logan
  • Wintergreen Group, LLC v. UDOT
  • Xanthos v. Salt Lake City Board of Adjustment
  • Yee v. City of Escondido
  • Zoning Estoppel
  • Zoning Estoppel–Expanded
  • About Advisory Opinions
  • Request Training

S.B. 64-S: Homeowner Reserve Account Amendments

http://le.utah.gov/~2013/bills/sbillenr/SB0064.pdf

  Amends:

57-8-7.5

57-8a-211

    

Effective Date:  May 14, 2013

            This bill adopts language governing how “reserve funds” are created and managed by a homeowner’s association.

See also S.B. 90S2

RETURN to Legislative Summary

Resources

  • About the Ombudsman How can the Ombudsman help me?
  • Takings and Eminent DomainWhat can I do when the government wants to take my land?
  • Land Use and DevelopmentWhat laws govern the development of land?
  • About Mediation and Arbitration How does the Ombudsman resolve disputes?
  • About Advisory Opinions Can you formally review my land use dispute?
  • Contact Us

Find Advisory Opinions

  • Advisory OpinionsView advisory opinions.

Recent News

  • 2014 LEGISLATIVE SUMMARY
  • New Case Summary — Marvin Brandt Revocable Trust v. United States
  • New Case Summary — Powder Run at Deer Valley v. Black Diamond Lodge and Park City
  • New Case Summary — UDOT v. Walker Development Partnership
  • New Case Summary — Q-2, LLC v. Hughes

Contact Information

Office Location
Heber M. Wells Building, 2nd Floor
160 East 300 South
Salt Lake City, Utah

Phone: (801) 530-6391
Toll-free in Utah: 1-877-882-4662
Fax: (801) 530-6338
Email: propertyrights@utah.gov

Mailing Address
Office of the Property Rights Ombudsman
State of Utah Department of Commerce
P.O. Box 146702
Salt Lake City, UT 84114-6702

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.